Pre Enrollment Prepration - SAP SD

April 9, 2016, 11:08 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: PCA Actual version values to be transfer to Forecast version

≪ Previous: Re: How to create file in AL11

$

0

0

Hi

 

I am planning to go for a SAP SD Certification from a authorized center.Before going for enrollment, I am doing self study. Here I need your guidance and advice.

 

Briefing about my profile: BBA, MBA (Marketing) - around 1 year of work experience in Retail Banking Sales & 1 year in HR - Recruitment (Currently working in this field)

 

Through my current work profile is recruitment, I will go for SAP SD Course, because I not strong in theoretical part of HR.

 

Lets come to my current scenario.

 

I am following Glynn C. Willams book & erpgreat website. My basis understanding is that there is big difference in terms preparation for certification exam preparation and preparation for interview preparation. Correct me if I am wrong.

 

I have already gone through the first 3 chapters in Glynn C. Willams, currently reading 4th chapter i.e.Contracts and Special Processes.

 

Many things I do understand and Many things I don't understand. Even if I understand something, I don't have clarity and confidence,may be because I can't practice in system. How to I overcome this?

 

There are many codes & tables. do I need to memories all codes & tables?

 

I have roughly 15 days before my class starts. Suggest & advice me how can I prepare & utilize these 15 days? What are the chapters should I complete before attend the class.

 

Thanks,

 

Arindam Sur

---

Re: PCA Actual version values to be transfer to Forecast version

April 10, 2016, 10:47 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: IM PS overall budget release to annual budget release activation process

≪ Previous: Pre Enrollment Prepration - SAP SD

$

0

0

I think it's ke62

IM PS overall budget release to annual budget release activation process

April 10, 2016, 10:45 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: How do you add an external crystal report to menu in SAP B1

≪ Previous: Re: PCA Actual version values to be transfer to Forecast version

$

0

0

DEARS,

Our client is using IM PS module with overall release budget availability check for the last ten years.

 

In short, create IM program investment program in 2007 till 2016 i.e. INT/2007 till INT/2016 and only enter budget (IM32 and IM30 for additional budgets) and distribute budget IM52 to projects as measures in the respective year program, where in PS they release the overall budget as required for the project WBSE. and WBSE use the release budget for commitment and actual in all years when ever required.

 

Due to overall release budget check active in system, as part of closing activity the client only run IM27 with copy program structure only, and never carry forward measures/appropriation requests or budget/plan values.

 

Till now there is no issue as the measure created in old program still get budget from overall release in the current fiscal years from the respective program.

 

Client wants to open time frame for annual release budget in IM and PS and want to activate availability check on annual release.

 

Requirement / Question:

 

1. is it recommended to go from overall to annual budget release check. is there any inconsistency error may occurs in future for such change?

 

2. if we activate annual budget release what approach should we follow:

 

a. Open time frame for IM and PS annual budget annual release budget. Do carry forward commitments CJCF from prior fiscal years till 2016 in PS.

b. Enter IM and PS annual and release budget in prior fiscal year equal to assigned actual values in PS and current fiscal year enter commitment + actual = annual and release budget.

c. Activate annual release budget availability check then reconstruct availability control CJBN for all projects and Reconstruct Project Info Database CJEN.

 

Kindly suggest for any pros and cons and any recommended programs to do such huge activity.

 

thanks

Saqib Usman

Re: How do you add an external crystal report to menu in SAP B1

April 10, 2016, 10:49 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: issues about BO migration

≪ Previous: IM PS overall budget release to annual budget release activation process

$

0

0

Thanks!  Works fine :-)

Re: issues about BO migration

April 10, 2016, 10:52 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Report: SPROX_CHECK_HTTP_COMMUNICATION ERROR

≪ Previous: Re: How do you add an external crystal report to menu in SAP B1

$

0

0

So, LCMBIAR file was created on SP2 and you want to import this into SP4 system?

Can you confirm if you are running CLI from SP4 system?

 

UMT is not the right tool for you as it is meant for migration from older versions(<=3.x) to 4.X.

Re: Report: SPROX_CHECK_HTTP_COMMUNICATION ERROR

April 10, 2016, 10:55 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: GR not allowed despite Certified

≪ Previous: Re: issues about BO migration

$

0

0

Did you check the settings in SM59 and do a connection test over there?

Re: GR not allowed despite Certified

April 10, 2016, 10:57 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: HANA procedure error - SAP DBTech JDBC: [269]: too many values: ZZPROCESSED

≪ Previous: Re: Report: SPROX_CHECK_HTTP_COMMUNICATION ERROR

$

0

0

Hi,

 

Check in QCPR table for your PurOrd + Line Item combination and check if the material 2892 is the one against which the certificate entry is created or not. Else, for this unique combination (Material + PurOrd + Line Item) you need to create a new Certificate in QC51 and then check if GR is getting allowed for it.

 

Also, please remember, you need to select is certificate is Enclosed as "YES" as this is already created manually.

 

Thanks,

Arijit

HANA procedure error - SAP DBTech JDBC: [269]: too many values: ZZPROCESSED

April 10, 2016, 11:02 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: FormatNumber "#.##[%]%" ) --->why you need [%]...?

≪ Previous: Re: GR not allowed despite Certified

$

0

0

Dear Experts,

 

I am trying to write a procedure (Code in screenshot below) in HANA which will Insert data into a target table (BKPF_TOPJV , This is having definition as Original Source table BKPF ) based on all columns for selected rows of certain join conditions. However I am getting "too many values" error while executing the procedure.

 

Below is the snippet of the code and error -

 

Could you please help me to guide the root cause and fix for this. Please find attached table DDL for Target table which is copied from Source Table DDL and changed the table name
.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Jiten

---

FormatNumber "#.##[%]%" ) --->why you need [%]...?

April 10, 2016, 11:05 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: FMEQ - Document Journal for encumbrance only displays summary, and not the line items

≪ Previous: HANA procedure error - SAP DBTech JDBC: [269]: too many values: ZZPROCESSED

$

0

0

I have been searching on the web how to do FormatNumber() to %

 

I found below link but I am struggling with this...

http://www.forumtopics.com/busobj/viewtopic.php?p=751491

 

What I do not understand is this syntax.

 

"#.##[%]%"

 

Why do you need to put [%] between brackets?

 

Could anyone please guide me to resources for using symbols such as %, $, etc...?

I want to understand the rules regarding the use of symbols in FormatNumber() syntax...

 

Thank you...

 

FMEQ - Document Journal for encumbrance only displays summary, and not the line items

April 8, 2016, 9:15 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Apply Conditional Formatting to Multiple Columns at Once...is it possible?

≪ Previous: FormatNumber "#.##[%]%" ) --->why you need [%]...?

$

0

0

Hello folks,

We were getting the error FMCF 320 while posting Invoice Receipt. So we applied the Notes 2118110 and 1991999 and other prerequisite notes. We don't have any issue with invoice postings anymore. However, the FMEQ report (RFFMEPGAX) for encumbrance displays only the summary for reductions (amount type '0200') and not the detail lines anymore. Also the FM posting date (ZHLDT) column on the report is defaulted to 01/01/2016.

 

How can I get back the line items to display in the Document Journal report? Could the BADI 'FMRP_RFFMEPGAX_EXIT' be of any help?

 

Your help is greatly appreciated >>>removed by  moderator<<<

Thanks in advance!

 

Message was edited by: Jürgen L

Apply Conditional Formatting to Multiple Columns at Once...is it possible?

April 10, 2016, 11:25 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Microsoft Outlook integration for SAP Business One 8.8.1

≪ Previous: FMEQ - Document Journal for encumbrance only displays summary, and not the line items

$

0

0

I have a big table with 20 columns.

I need to apply a formatting rule to each column.

 

Is there anyway to do it at once...?

 

I select all columns but it does not allow me to click.

 

 

 

 

 

If I select 1 column, I can click on the formatting rules.

 

If it is 1 or 2 columns, it is OK.

But if it is a big table, I have a problem...

 

Can anyone please help me with this matter...?

Re: Microsoft Outlook integration for SAP Business One 8.8.1

April 11, 2016, 11:31 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Workflows triggering one after another

≪ Previous: Apply Conditional Formatting to Multiple Columns at Once...is it possible?

$

0

0

Hi Anastasya.

 

Could you share little bit details about MS outlook integration's?

 

BR

SS

Re: Workflows triggering one after another

April 11, 2016, 11:31 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Search by WBS element not working in overview tree for ME21N

≪ Previous: Re: Microsoft Outlook integration for SAP Business One 8.8.1

$

0

0

What is a flex workflow? MV45AFZZ is a user exit?

There are a few ways workflow can be triggered, from change documents (transaction SWEC), status management (BSVW)etc.  see Event Creation - SAP Business Workflow - SAP Library check to see if one of those options isn't triggering an event.

Re: Search by WBS element not working in overview tree for ME21N

April 11, 2016, 11:32 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: load balancing on BI 4.1 SP6

≪ Previous: Re: Workflows triggering one after another

$

0

0

Hi,

   Please check whether the PR exists in EBKN table with the mentioned WBS element. Also check whether the PR is released and allowing to add in PO manually. If its allowing to add the PR manually in ME21N, but not return value when WBS is given as input, revert back with your EHP details.

 

Regards,

AKPT

Re: load balancing on BI 4.1 SP6

April 11, 2016, 11:32 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Cannot create target element /ns0:mt_is_respuesta_res. Values missing in queue context. Target XSD requires a value for this element, but the target-field mapping does not create one

≪ Previous: Re: Search by WBS element not working in overview tree for ME21N

$

0

0

Load balancing topic is out of BO area. You need to refer F5 documentation for how to setup or work with your network team.. There is some information in BO admin guide related to load balancer.

---

Re: Cannot create target element /ns0:mt_is_respuesta_res. Values missing in queue context. Target XSD requires a value for this element, but the target-field mapping does not create one

April 11, 2016, 11:32 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Problem while Posting a Transaction

≪ Previous: Re: load balancing on BI 4.1 SP6

$

0

0

thank for you reply,

 

I exec script in BBDD and returned values

a hints for identify error.

 

thank for your help.

Re: Problem while Posting a Transaction

April 11, 2016, 11:32 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: NF-e PI 7.4 Configuration for AEX

≪ Previous: Re: Cannot create target element /ns0:mt_is_respuesta_res. Values missing in queue context. Target XSD requires a value for this element, but the target-field mapping does not create one

$

0

0

Madan,

 

Hi. I spent some time looking for this KBA and I cannot find it. This means it may not be published or released or I haven't written it up yet or filed it in a different subject header or I cannot remember the authors name (looked at over 10 authors) or it could be sitting in my Microsoft Outlook email messages. All I remember is that on one of the temporary directory where most of the temp (tmp) files are stored during transmit (each transmit a tmp file will store the data for external data property - normally tied to an attachment - these tmp files are internal temp files which may grow if not checked), the directory is filled with too much of it and nobody can work with those documents or images tied to external data property.  But I cannot find it right now. If I find it I'll try to go back to this discussion and paste it.

 

If your issue exist in multiple devices then the theory of the tmp file may not be your issue. It may be a client issue that was just introduced. 

 

Was this technique working before in older SMP 3.0 SDK? Or was this only tested in newer versions (WPF Client 70.11.0.5 in a Windows 7 Laptop)?  Another SMP 3.0 SDK SP12 release is coming out ~ approx in 3rd week of April (depending if it passes QA). My suggestion is if this issue occurs in SP12 then it may be an issue.  Another technique is to see if this issue occurs on an SMP 3.0 SP08 (most of the newer products of SAP has a lot of test done on SP08 - this includes attachment or images). I am wondering if this issue occurs in older SP08 or if it was introduced in the newer SPK versions?

 

I noticed that you have an incident in SAP talking about this same issue as mentioned above (you opened an SAP incident). With respect to the incident, any issues tied to the issue needs to be proven and an Agentry.db or reproduction steps to connect to your environment is minimum needed to get the WPF client team to look at it closely.  But what can help is my question/recommendation above (normally dev team will ask you to try the latest and if it still fails on the latest to get more information on how to reproduce internally in SAP).

 

Regards,

Mark Pe
SAP Platinum Support Engineer

Re: NF-e PI 7.4 Configuration for AEX

April 11, 2016, 11:32 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Valores Ativo Fixo

≪ Previous: Re: Problem while Posting a Transaction

$

0

0

Obrigado pela resposta, a opção escolhida foi "Validação pelo adaptador". Eu mudei para "Sem Validação", mas não funcionou.

Alguma outra dica

Re: Valores Ativo Fixo

April 11, 2016, 11:33 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: PP Testing Documentation

≪ Previous: Re: NF-e PI 7.4 Configuration for AEX

$

0

0

Carlos,

 

 

Verifique nas tabelas ANEP para ítens, e ANEK para cabeçalhos.

 

 

Att

Re: PP Testing Documentation

April 11, 2016, 11:33 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Migrating from BW: BPS0 to BW: IP

≪ Previous: Re: Valores Ativo Fixo

$

0

0

In such cases, all the business processes(implemented) needs to be tested end to end to make sure there are no breaks in the existing functionality due to upgrade.