Hi Charl,
There is lot of information available on SDN for the same.You can start with help document mentioned below:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/44/059baf6ef7025be10000000a1553f7/content.htm
Thanks
Indu
Re: Migrating from BW: BPS0 to BW: IP
↧
↧
Re: PFC Grid Issue
Hi Roland;
1) I assume that you used the PB 12.6 version of the PFC (http://pfc.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest)?
2) Have you applied any PB 12.6 EBF's (current build is 4091)?
Regards ... Chris
↧
Re: How to Put Search in FilterBar and Smart filterBar.......???
Hi Virendra,
<smartFilterBar:SmartFilterBar
id="smartFilterBar"
enableBasicSearch="true"
entityType="Product"
persistencyKey="SmartFilterPKey">
<smartFilterBar:controlConfiguration>
<smartFilterBar:ControlConfiguration
key="Category"
visibleInAdvancedArea="false"
preventInitialDataFetchInValueHelpDialog="false">
</smartFilterBar:ControlConfiguration>
</smartFilterBar:controlConfiguration>
</smartFilterBar:SmartFilterBar>
just add enableBasicSearch="true" your smart control
↧
Re: Allocation combined with *REC generation
Hi David, Hi Jörg (you old rabbit 
) ,
@David: I replaced the *REC(EXPRESSION = (%VALUE% *GET.. with *REC(FACTOR=GET... -> no joy.
Again: When I take out the allocation section (the one-to-many copy) and I ensure that the scope is taken care of in section 2, I get predictable and correct results when using an input form to enter single data. The combination CASH/VOL or the combination TAXRATE/NO_PARM delivers correct REBATES, for instance, even when I use the EXPRESSION version with the %VALUE%. Stand alone section works just fine.
________________________________________________________________
// Section 2
//* The following scope is new
*XDIM_MEMBERSET PARM = VOL,NO_PARM
*XDIM_MEMBERSET ACCOUNT = %ACCOUNT_SET%
*WHEN PARM
*IS "VOL"
*WHEN ACCOUNT
*IS "CASH"
*REC(EXPRESSION = (%VALUE% * GET(ACCOUNT="TAXRATE",PARM="NO_PARM") * FLD(TIME.DAYSINPERIOD) / FLD(TIME.DAYSINYEAR)) , ACCOUNT="REBATES",PARM="NO_PARM")
*IS "ACCREC"
*REC(EXPRESSION = (%VALUE% * GET(ACCOUNT="TAXINCENTRATE",PARM="NO_PARM") * FLD(TIME.DAYSINPERIOD) / FLD(TIME.DAYSINYEAR) ) , ACCOUNT="INTERESTEXP",PARM="NO_PARM")
*ENDWHEN
*ENDWHEN
*COMMIT
____________________________________________________________________
Only when I include the allocation part (see above) in the default.lgf then I don't get correct results any more. The DM package Default Formulas solves all the problems again, ie correct results for the allocation in section 1 and the calculation in section 2. There seems to be some "magic" in default formulas that default.lgf does not have. I have a log of "default formulas" that I could provide.
If nothing else works for this combination, then maybe the strange FOR-NEXT construction of BPC for the copy part in section 1 will work. Or good ol' Excel formulas in the sheet (which I would like to avoid).
Regards.
Wolfgang
↧
Re: IDT - Alter mandatory filter options
Hi Didier,
first of all thanks for the detailed reply .
Unfortunately I can't use the aggregate aware because the universe and the table has 1.000 dimension ad it is impossible to add the function for the objects.
I'm looking for a solution that can change the generated SQL filter without the usage of derived\alias table because the universe is really big and consolidated.
thanks!
Maurizio
↧
↧
Re: Advanced DSO (ADSO) in Multiprovider
Hi Niels,
I suggest to create a Composite Provider with exactly the same structure as the MultiProvider (i.e. use the same InfoObjects). Then use t/code RSZC to copy the BEx Queries from MultiProvider to Composite Provider.
Note that in t/code RSZC you should enter the Composite Provider technical name with prefix @3, i.e.:
@3<Composite_Provider_Name>
Please also refer to the discussion How to copy queries on top of composite provider.
Best regards,
Sander
↧
Quality in eWM
Hi Gurus,
What is preliminary inspection in eWM.
Can we create inspection document before GR using this Inspection Object type?
Please provide the information on inspection object types if we can create new customized inspection object types which can be used to create inspection document before GR in eWM.
↧
Re: ML81N dump while entering services
This is just a tiny fraction of the whole dump, important information from the dump is missing, see this document to understand how to read a dump: ABAP Dumps
Based on missed information you can search for OSS notes, I did it for example for the piece that could be seen, used those two words for a search: SAPLMLSP table_invalid_index
It retrieved 9 notes about such dumps, most of them error corrections in earlier releases, but worth to read as they sometimes explain the root cause or have correction reports or advises like this one
413131 - TABLE_INVALID_INDEX reports for deleting incorrect documents
↧
Re: Mobile apps in BO 4.2?
Thanks Ajay
So in our current BO version (4.1 SP3), how do I check if my webi reports are mobile device compatible?
↧
↧
Scope of an ABAP Consultant in the wake of S/4 HANA
Hi Gurus,
I have been working as an ABAP consultant for more than a decade. As S/4 HANA is going to be a big thing going forward, I would like to know the scope of an ABAP Consultant in S/4 HANA Implementation. What are the relevant modules/topics in S/4 HANA an ABAP consultant can learn? SAP Fiori seems to be the technical thing at programming level. Is ABAP going to play the same significant role in SAP Fiori development as it is now? Or is it of very limited scope? What are the prerequisites to learn SAP Fiori?
I would like to request the Gurus to help me guide in answering these questions.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sunil
↧
SAP functionality to report Ghost Employees
Hi Friends,
We have a requirement to identify and notify Ghost employees in the system to Payroll Compliance Manager.
Any pointer please let me know.
Thank you
Viswa
↧
Re: SAP HANA web dispatcher not starting
Can you please reename the webdispatcher.ini file and start the instance again.
↧
Re: Any way to fix the note implementation status?
Well, my procrastination paid off and I got lucky on this one. SAP issued yet another note for the same report as in the allegedly incompletely implemented note. So I just installed 2237417 and then 2237420 on top and now everything seems to be peachy: the old note is now set to "completely implemented" and we have the newest report version active. Phew!
↧
↧
Re: PB-12.5: Print Queue - Determine if print was successful from DW.
Actually I need to use the ENUMJOBS external call, have found many links (Bruce Armstrong) with code examples but they no longer exist(Sybase), if anyone knows where I can find them, could you please post them.
I will continue to search for them.
Thank you.
↧
Re: BI/IPS 4.2
Looks like IPS 4.2 SP02 is available to download. 
I have a question here about DS comptability patch with IPS 4.2 SP02 , as per PAM documnet (last updated 03/25/2016) and SAP Notes 1740516 DS version should be 4.2 SP06 Patch 3. but only 4.2 SP06 Patch 02 available in instllation and upgrades download area and 4.2 SP06 patch 03 is available in support packages and patches area.
can i install 4.2 SP06 Patch 02 and then apply patch 03 on top of IPS 4.2 SP02 ?
or
do i need 4.2 SP06 Patch 03 ?
please help me understanding
Thanks
↧
Re: How to correct the below error? please provide solution.
You have to investigate why the processing on the remote RFC is taking so much time to complete.
Or why the caller (source of the RFC call) has ended before the results could be sent back 
.
Cheers!
Isaías
↧
Re: is compression working for NOT hana-optimized info cube in a scale-out system?
Currently we are not performing the conversion. Might be another team who will do that part. sadly we do not have much visibility. But currently in development, I have not encountered a hana optimized info cube. I am also worried once it is not done, but it is not a required step inour checklist
↧
↧
Re: Does Crystal Server require a dedicated machine?
It's not just how many users, it's also how and when reports run (scheduled vs. interactive viewing) along with how complex the reports are. Running reports takes a lot of RAM and Crystal can do a lot of swapping to disk under certain circumstances.
It also will depend on how CPU-intensive the other apps are and how many CPU cores are available on the server. I usually recommend a minimum of 8 CPU cores and 32GB of RAM for my clients when we're setting up a new server for this. So, if you were running other apps, you would need more. Also, if this is on a VM, SAP highly recommends that the CPUs and RAM be "reserved" for this server so that there's no contention for the resources.
-Dell
↧
Re: no TSK files are generated during ABAP export
Hi Harish,
Have you checked *.TSK files in your export directory if those exists and their size is not =0. Please provide export log to analyze further.
Thanks,
MPS
↧
Re: Vendor line item - Mass changes for payment method supplement
why should it a MM issue if you talk about FBL1N?
It could be MM if you talk about mass changes in vendor master, or mass changes in a PO, but mass changes in vendor items belongs certainly to FI.
Because of that I am moving this discussion to FI
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
