Correct but for practice or exploring purpose browsers incognito mode
can be used ??
Re: browser cache issue SAP UI5
↧
↧
Re: SO delivery items cannot be delivered
Hi Ramesh,
If the schedule line is confirmed ?
Can you please tell us to which standard schedule line it is similar to ?
If there are already deliveries available for this material please check the goods movement tab in the delivery to see if it is looking for special stock.
If yes please check if inventory with special stock is available for the combination of plant and storage location.
Let me know the findings.
Thanks,
Abhijit
↧
Re: browser cache issue SAP UI5
Clearing/disabling caching is fine for testing, however Jayasree mentioned deploying to production, where you can't rely on user clearing their cache.
Regards,
Jason
↧
Re: Planned/production order generating for a sales order that is complete
Ravindra,
can you please help me to understand this stock transfer requirement..
Well, you first have to understand your company's underlying business processes. In this case, you manufacture a material in one plant, but the place where it is needed is in another plant. SAP allows you to plan the entire supply chain so that the appropriate documents (production orders; planned orders, stock transport orders, etc etc) are created for every transaction that will be needed to complete the sales order, in every plant or location.
According to your latest MD04, you still have legitimate demand in the alternate plant. The new production order in the original plant (the one you say is a duplicate and shouldn't exist) is therefore legitimate.
In the latest MD04, the demand is coming from, as you noted, a production order reservation. This material is a component of material 9840T. If you click on the ordres and display, you will see the production order that is driving the requirement. You can also do the MD04 on 9840T and see what the supply-demand situation is there.
Right now, I don't see any software issues here. Everything that you have shown me follows what I would consider to be standard business processes. I don't know what made you think that there were superfluous production orders (that was your original issue) but you haven't yet shown me any evidence that this actually exists. It is acceptable to have more than one production order supporting a sales order item.
I think we have progressed quite a bit. I think what you need to do now is to speak to one of your local planners, who is familiar with this company's business processes. This stuff is a bit arcane for someone who doesn't really have a basic understanding of planning concepts.
Best Regards & good luck,
DB49
↧
SAPUI5 - Looking for ways to optimize performance
Hello sapui5 experts,
currently, our customer uses three views (login, selection, table) for their application. The application contains a json model.
The data is fetched via proper rest service which delivers data in json format. During selection of some criteria, rest calls are done. Finally, the selected
data is rendered in sap.ui.table control.
Not being satisfied with the performance of the application, I´d like to know some ways to optimize the performance of the application.
I´m looking forward to your recommendations and useful information.
Many thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Rufat Gadirov
↧
↧
Re: SAP Hazardous Sub.Management Urgent
Dear Tarun
let us focus on "SARA" option in EHS. This is explained here:
SARA Reports - Hazardous Substance Management (EHS-HSM) - SAP Library
The "determination" part is explained here:Determination of Hazardous Substance Quantities for SARA Reports - Hazardous Substance Management (EHS-HSM) - SAP Librar…
I am sorry to say: we do not use this kind of SARA one: but if you read cross the solution as explained in Online help you need:
a.) a material (e.g. of type FERT etc.)
b.) if you closer look you need a REAL_SUB
c.) and you need composition data
d.) etc.
Therefore: I am sorry: you need some basic EHS set up to support the SARA report. Therefore may be check first:
a.) which SAP release do you use?
b.) is EHS function still activated
c.) if so: what is the status of EHS ? Only the "SAP original" customizing in place ?
etc. etc.
The topic of "SARA/EHS" is discussed in this FORUM rarely. Examples are:
Core EHS Functionality for upstream Energy
How EHS links to Material Management??
EPA RMP/OSHA PSM/DHS Regulations and SVT
Hazardous Substance Management
How EHS links to Material Management??
Besides HSM, what needs to be configured to activate the SARA 311 312 reports?
Coming back to your other question:
"Is this same process like list/pure and Real_sub or (list/pure and Haz_Mat) ? what is the major difference between these 2 specifications HAZ_MAT and REAL_SUB ?"
You new one specification type; eiher HAZ_MAT or REAL_SUB; Then you need to maintain data in "property" as assigne to either HAZ_MAT of REAL_SUB one; As You need component data in most cases you can use the same data model (e.g. using LIST_SUB, PURE_SUB)
BUt if you look "closer" to the SAP help and to the threads mentioned above you need more EHS configuration; I am not sure; i did not checked, but may be there is a "Best Practise" approach for HSM available.
C.B.
PS: HAZ_MAT/REAL_SUB => these are "proposal" by SAP; any company decide different how to use them; SAP does not procide clear guidance here; may be check your system after you have done the set up; You need to check of HAZ_MAT is assigned well to property tree STANDARD as REAL_SUB; if this is the case: there is no difference oin "process" any more
↧
Re: SAP system performance problems
Hi Samid
1. On your ECC system when system performance getting slow or degraded, check the following transaction codes to know the system status
SM66 – To check over all global workprocess status, any table keeps on reading or getting struck?
SM21 – Check the any error log
ST02 – Memory / Buffer usage?
ST22 - Any time out or DBIF ... Dumps?
2. Most of the time Z-reports are running long time. Due to this normal transaction users are getting affected. For this you can enable the transaction code ST12 trace check the overall DB & ABAP program usage.
3. On your Cluster environment one node can have DB & Application instance and another node can handle the end user transactions. Since the windows 2003 server end of support on this year try to upgrade the existing system to either windows 2008 or 2012 with Failover cluster.
4. On your MS SQL DB have you define the 30% of memory for DB? And also you can refer the SCN link how to tune the MS SQL DB
Tune your SQL Server SAP Database
BR
SS
↧
Re: How to show the attached document in email in inline mode
Hi Eitan,
The parameter i_text will receive some plain text, string which will be passed to the function method.
Thanks for the link, I'll check it.
↧
Re: inspection type 11 and 06
Hi Raju,
Please can you check if "Basic Settings at Plant Level" is activated with appropriate details, in case if you are activating QM for the first time.
If both the inspection types "11" and "06" is added in your material master - QM view, please can you check inspection type "Active" indicator is ticked.
Also can you check with your technical team if any other enhancement is active which is blocking your inspection lot creation. At the same time your can also check customer exit QAAT0001.
Thanks,
Arijit
↧
↧
Re: Sick Error
Hi Patil
Kindly follow the steps
1. Stop the SAP instance.
2. Take the full backup of DB & SAP instance folder
3. Download the latest version of MS SQL 2005 and start install the service pack.
4. Check the service pack version which already mention in the SAP Notes 62988
5. Restart the system, check the SAP instance
6. Refer the SAP KBA for download the service pack
1733195 - Microsoft SQL Server version and download list
BR
SS
↧
Re: SAP crystal report
Hi Abhilash
thank you so much.
↧
Re: Confirmation time Lag by one Hour at CO11N
Dear Marcelo
good day
i already checked it and change the user time zone but the problem remain founded .
i think this problem because time zone in the system CET ---- UCT + 1hour and it must be
Egypt -------- UCT + 2 Hours
↧
Re: PI 7.31 ESR & ID client components not opening with Java 7 webstart
Hi Hareesh,
You seem to be correct my user does not have unrestricted access to lunch ESR/ID.
While checking in http://host:port/useradmin it says not authorized.
So, I guess the admin team has to provide unrestricted access to both ESR and ID.
Apart from that user also does not have permission to view NWA.
I will check and come back.
↧
↧
SMP 3.0: Agentry - Using source=INI in JavaBE.ini
All.
I have previously posted a question and a document regarding this issue:
SMP 3.0: Setup local Agentry development environment with source=INI in JavaBE.ini and Re: SMP 3.0: Agentry use of source=INI in JavaBE.ini
Previously I have only used this technique in development Agentry instances, but now I am trying to extend the use to production Agentry instances.
And this is where all the troubles start.
If I change JavaBE.ini to use source=INI in a production Agentry instance, then after I restart the instance it will be erroneous.
The Back End configuration of the Agentry Application will be gone, and I get runtime errors when I try to perform a transmit from the client.
Error will be something like: No Backends loaded.
Question:
Does anybody know if source=INI is (still) offically supported ?
And if Yes, is it only supported for development instances of Agentry ?
Thanks.
Søren Hansen
↧
Re: Accessing all the line items of Purchase requisition(ME51N)
Hi Qingda Niu,
Thank you for the information. My requirement is while creating PR the user will enter the field 'Desired Vendor' in first line item only. When save it the same vendor number will be copied to the rest line item. I have written the below code, in debugger mode I checked the structure is updating and set_data is calling successfully. But the database table 'EBAN' is not being updated.
Here is the code.
DATA : ls_item TYPE mmpur_requisition_items,"mereq_item,
lw_item TYPE mmpur_requisition_item,
pr_item TYPE REF TO if_purchase_requisition_item,
lv_lifnr TYPE wlief,
ls_req_item TYPE mereq_item,
ls_datax TYPE mereq_itemx.
CALL METHOD im_header->get_items
* EXPORTING
* im_auth_check = MMPUR_NO
* im_release_op = MMPUR_NO
RECEIVING
re_items = ls_item
.
LOOP AT ls_item INTO lw_item.
pr_item = lw_item-item.
CALL METHOD pr_item->get_data
RECEIVING
re_data = ls_req_item.
IF ls_req_item-lifnr IS NOT INITIAL.
lv_lifnr = ls_req_item-lifnr.
ELSE.
ls_req_item-lifnr = lv_lifnr.
CALL METHOD pr_item->set_data
EXPORTING
im_data = ls_req_item.
MOVE: 'X' TO ls_datax-lifnr,
'X' TO ls_datax-lifnr.
pr_item->set_datax( ls_datax ) .
pr_item->set_datax( im_datax = ls_datax ).
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Could you please tell me what I missed?
Regards,
Jitendra
↧
Re: Baseline Date
Hi again!
I have found something interesting, Is possible that day limit fixed in OBB8 always refer to Entry Date??
I refer to this field.
I have made this test. All tests I have made today (01/11/2015) fill due date 03/25/2015. Then I have change this "Day limit" to 17 and the same test (same document) fill with due date 03/10/2015.
It will explain why all my tests done at the begining of this post ( 01/08/2015) taked due date 03/10/2015.
In case of that I will finally find an explanation of this behaviour but, Can I configured this Day Limit to consider Document day (for example)
I believe I'm close to the solution, I only need a bit of help to confirm what I think.
Best Regards and thank you very much!
↧
Re: attachments on Business Partner
Hi Raghu,
In general, importing attachment data is not supported via the standard
importers. One approach to consider is to develop an Explicitly Called Script to
read the files from the app server and attach it to document in Sourcing.
Regards,
Vikram
↧
↧
Re: Consignment Process -Purchase Order Creation with ME21N
Hello Hitesh ranga,
Please verify in your info record consignment in trx. ME12 which valuation have you save.
Regards,
Xavier
↧
Re: SP_Required for Blocking Payment entry in wrong Document series
Hi,
Possible , you need to make a query based on Current logged in user and Department of that user.
Regards,
Manish
↧
Re: How to split a message into chunks in a file to proxy interface
Hi, Hareesh.
Here is file adapter config:
The test file has about 1000 records, but from PI(PIMON) or ECC(SXMB_MONI), I only see one message created. I am expecting to see 20 different messages either in PI or ECC. It seems like somehow PI merges the data into one message before sending it over to ECC. Actually I am not sure about that as I see no proof PI has done any "splitting".
If I use chunkmode, the same thing happens and I have to be in EOIO with a queue. That is not what I want to begin with.
Thanks,
Jonathan.
↧
