Hi,
It's true if you update the record the same day It's why I said to test UpdateDate against NULL value, which is correct only when the record is created.
Regards,
Eric
Hi,
It's true if you update the record the same day It's why I said to test UpdateDate against NULL value, which is correct only when the record is created.
Regards,
Eric
Hi Team ,
We have an issue regarding a FIORI application for tracking the sales order .
We are able login into Launch pad , when we click on Tracking Sales Order - > It will redirect to Tracking Sales order webpage on the same page we were able to view the Customer details but when we click on Customer to track the sales order order it display no records found .
The Backend configuration is working fine , Badi's implemented are working fine when tested for stand alone .
Pl help us in this regard .
Regards
Abhimanyu
it would help all of us if you would describe in much more detail as to how you wanted the end user to interact with this report and what the report should do.
right now it sounds like you want to suppress the entire subreport and you also mentioned suppressing the main report.
you've had several forum posts regarding this now and i'm not sure if you're trying to suppress certain parts of the report or trying to filter out certain database records. a simple description of filtering and suppression are below:
-filtering (Report > Selection Formulas > Record) chooses specific records from being returned (or not returned) from the database.
- suppression (right clicking on a section > Section Expert) will suppress an entire section based on a condition.
please answer these questions:
1) Main Report
a) are you trying to suppress ALL of the main report sections based on a parameter? or
b) are you trying to filter out certain records based on a parameter? or
c) are you trying to suppress ALL of the main report if ONE record contains a certain value?
2) Subreport
a) are you trying to suppress the entire subreport based on a parameter? or
b) are you trying to filter out certain records based on a parameter?
Hi
Colin Cooper and Sergi Marin, thanks for your useful answers.
I still can not find any documents on performance tuning related to SSM10.
It would be great if SAP can provide us with something.
We have logged the issue and are still waiting for OSS to come up with a solution.
Thanks again.
Zimkhita
Estimado, en la determinacion de cuentas del mayor (compras/ventas) debe definir esa cuenta que es nueva para las versiones 9.
Saludos
Here is what I want you to do - as a test:
1) Backup the report
2) Delete the subreport
3) The only code I want in your project as far as CR is concerned (e.g., no parameter code, no nothing):
Dim objRRpt As New CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument()
objRRpt.Load("C:\TESTS\font.rpt")
objRRpt.SetDataSource(dsReport);
CrystalReportViewer1.ReportSource = crReportDocument
The behavior should be: the viewer coms on the screen. parameter prompt screen appears. You enter the params. Report should show up in the viewer with no errors.
Does that work?
- Ludek
Dear Nagarajan,
Thanks for the help but I can not use "[LineNum] = 0" because sometimes line 0 is being deleted.
Regard,
Abdul...
Hello Gurus,
I would first of all thank you all helping me so far.
The current issue is with alerts in SAP PI 7.31 Single Stack
I have configured alert rule in ID in D, Q and P systems and added the AlertConsumerJob in NWA-->Operations-->Jobs-->JavaScheduler.
The strange thing I am facing is, in D system ALERTS are getting for each and every failure in PI (for ex: channel stopped, duplicate primary key, jdbc connection failed..etc)
Coming to Q and P systems, ALERTS are triggering only for few failures (for ex: jdbc connection failed).
Please give me your valuable inputs that why ALERTS are not triggering for every failure in Q and P systems
Thanks a lot in advance.
Thanks
Ravi
If I compare the setup of access sequences for batch determination and message determination in purchasing, then almost everything is equal but one thing: exclusive indicator
in message determination you can control whether the access is made exclusive or you allow SAP to continue searching after it had found an entry.
This exclusive indicator control is not available for batch determination.
Hence I assume it is not foreseen in batch determination process. and the access stops with the first hit.
Hi Akhil,
As per your comments, you are trying to run a scenario where based on the material you are picking should be always from 802 storage type and hence you have assigned it at the movement type level - source field.
Once you maintain a storage type at movement type level, system will consider this as an interim and you can see that in LX20. Check the message at LX20 for your warehouse. However there is not much difference for interim and regular storage type.
I have few questions here,
1. What is the exact requirement for this assignment at movement type level?
2. Did you maintain for dynamic/fixed bin?
3. What is the picking strategy defined for this storage type?
Regards.
Thank you very much Malik. I really appreciate it.
Regards,
Charvi.
and 1 more,
what is the difference between Crystal Reports and where do i installed it and a Crystal Server 2011?
Hello Suman,
Thank you for your answer,
Actually I need a table with relation of Relevant Authorization Infoobjetct against each query in the system.
Jose.
Hi Dev,
You can use ASMA, the only flip side is you will have to define 3 receivers instead of 1 and route them to different directories through different channels (3 receiver agreements)....
With mapping , you have dynamic configuration and variable substitution which will work with one receiver.
Choice is yours.
Ambrish
Hi Sanjay,
Thanx for replying .
But there is need to get the middle name also.
Please tell me, How to achieve this ?
Regards,
Pankaj
Thanks for the input
Do you recommend any specific books in particular ??
Hi Suraj
From 12.1 onwards, when MII is deployed, it deploys 10 RFC and 10 IDOC Listener for communication. I believe, we cannot add any more like how its done in 12.0. So it would be 1 RFC/IDOC for one SAP for one program ID.
Regards
Tufale Ashai
Do you need to keep the text in the table header? If not, I would just remove the header text.
Just trying to understand the workflow.
Thanks,
Carly
Hi there
I'll move this to the travel management forum and please post any FI-TV related queries there but to answer your question, no in the standard version, overlapping travel requests for same dates are permitted whereas travel EXPENSES are not. If you try to create expense report from an overlapping travel request, it is coded for error. (note 1469149 also brings some changes to the customizing too)
To prevent overlapping travel requests can only be possible by modification and this is the case for trip schema PL.
thanks
Sally
The Modify statement will fail if there is already a row with same unique secondary index.
When you changed (INGENDAE,REMSCHEID) to (INGENDAE,Paris) for first record, new secondary index (INGENDAE,Paris) is still unique, not existing for any other record before your statement.
If you try to change 2nd record (SAL,Duisburg) to (Salorte,Duisburg), Modify statement should fail because there is already a record (record 3) whose secondary key is (Salorte,Duisburg).
This is required to maintain the uniqueness of secondary index.