Hi,
I have found manuals for 3.1 SP3 and SP4 'integration option for Microsoft sharepoint software'. These seem to essentially be SharePoint WebParts. I am trying to determine if our boxi environment, 3.1 SP5, would be compatible with our SharePoint environment, 2010 Standard edition. Has anyone gotten this to work? In the manuals only 2007 MOSS is mentioned.
Thanks,
Sam
Hi,
We have a system that currently uses trusted authentication to direct users to infoView. Is it an option for us to use trusted authentication from SharePoint to BOXI at the same time? BOXI 3.1 SP5.
Thanks,
Sam
No
Serigo,
If you have a limited amount of data you should not see response times in this range. Although, I have seen slower response time when the average transaction tables are > 2 Million records. The HANA live views are built as calculation views that, for the most part, execute in the Join Engine by design. If I build something custom using Analytic Views, the response times are often better because the processing takes place in the OLAP engine predominantly.
It would help if you could share more information about your version of HANA and HANA Hardware? Are you running true Suite on HANA or using the sidecar option with SLT to provision HANA? Which HANA Live business content are you using, etc...
Hi Sir,
Same error messages occurred.
Still can log to hana studio.
Thank you.
Regards,
Clint
Any thoughts experts?
Regards,
Sanjeev.
Hi Gretchen,
Nice option there. I usually have a test user created in DEV and simulate thee removing and adding roles.
Just to confirm, but no option to simulate adding roles and removing roles at the same time right?
Cheers,
Diego.
Hi Caetano/Mangalraj,
When checked the missing parts in process order could identify a list there.
Lets take the component marked in the screen pasted (missing parts overview) above. The stock availability is greater than the required ones as per MMBE screen. But ATP still has marked the component a missing element.
The quantity requested is well within the stock available but still marked as missing. The OPJJ settings are as follows:
Could you help me interpret the 'Scope of Check' ?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Rahul
Hi,
Thanks for showing the an other way of solution. Max this will exactly suits for the required solution. you had taken the 'Date Particulars' and the 'On Date' in separate row panes then how will you get the empty fields row by row in 'On Date' row pane..
Best Regards
Bandhav
Actually, I just figured it out. I can now get it to show tables that exists in the schema that matches the current user name.
A bit tedious as users won't show up under the Catalog and vice versa, but at least tables can be created in the appropriate schema using SQL. Sure there must be a user-friendlier way to do this.
Anyone with input on this would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
/Henrik
Hi,
Try with first one:
SELECTDateDiff(dd, $ [@ CONTRACT.U_StartDate], $[@CONTRACT.U_EndDate])
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan
On the Criminal History Reports, the POI images are retrieved from the Crystal Server via the following URL:
E.g.
The Crystal Report Image Handler added a cache-control header to the image response:
Cache-Control: public, max-age=15552000
As a result, the POI images are cached in the Temporary Internet Files folder by the IE browser.
For security reason the POI images should not be cached and we have implemented a servlet filter to set the cache-control header to no-cache for all responses from /BOE.
However the no-cache cache-control header could be not be added to the POI images.
Can the caching feature be turned off for the Crystal Report Viewer dynamicimage requests?
Where is the configuration file to control it?
Hi,
Looks like you need to have a look at using filtered rows for your selection boxes
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-44056
Cheers,
Josh
Hi George.
Thank you for answer me.
In my opinion the behaviour system is wrong, because this way the concept about cash flow is broken.
Do you know if there is one way, of customise the condition 1130 for change current system behaviour?
I want to enter an additional increase on capital structure, in future time, without change previous installments repayment amount and without run (TBB1).
Best regards
Jandoval Nascimento
HI Nidhi,
I'm facing a situation, wherein I need to do more than 1 exclusion on the same field and it's not working.
Let's take your example:
Suppose in rest1, you add one more restriction that PurchaseOrderItem not equal to '20',
Then in that case, how ill you achieve this.
Thanks & regards,
Jomy
You need to provide a bit more details here, cause what you've written and looking at your screenshot doesn't explain it for me. Also, looking your sql statement for the derived table, think you should rethink your strategy here, cause it looks way to manual and inefficient.
Hi,
Ask the admins to create "mount"/"share" of AS folder that users can access from their clients..?
cheers,
Janis
Hello
On a query like the one for which you provide data compression could only have a negative impact. It seems that all the data is in the cache (disk read = 0) & Elapsed time = CPU time.
For compressed table CPU time will always increase, as the data, must be uncompressed to be processed... Nothing to do about that... except perhaps uncompress the table.
If the query had to read the data from disk compression might have a positive impact as the data to be read would be 2 time smaller and might have balanced the time lost for uncompressing data.
Judging compression impact focusing on one select statement might not be very representative.
Best regards
Oi Gabriel,
Que versao do ERP voce esta trabalhando? Na meu sistema aqui (EHP6) eh flexivel, um ALV "normal", inclusive ja com algumas layouts standard:
Talvez seja problema de autorizacao.
Abraco,
Custodio
