Hi Abhilash

I entered the LowerCase statement into the formula, but out of 5 records containing the included criteria, only 2 were included in the output... so I added an UpperCase statement as well... but this made no difference... still only 2 records out of 5 in my output.

Here is the formula as it now stands.... let me know if the UpperCase lines are not required (could you explain how the LowerCase statement covers upper case data?).

IF Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"aboriginal") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"aboriginal") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"aboriginal") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"aboriginal") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"aboriginal") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"aborigine") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"aborigine") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"aborigine") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"aborigine") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"aborigine") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"aborigines") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"aborigines") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"aborigines") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"aborigines") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"aborigines") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"indigenous") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"indigenous") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"indigenous") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"indigenous") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"indigenous") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"didjeridu") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"didjeridu") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"didjeridu") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"didjeridu") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"didjeridu") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"didgeridoo") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"didgeridoo") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"didgeridoo") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"didgeridoo") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"didgeridoo") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"boomerang") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"boomerang") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"boomerang") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"boomerang") > 0

or Instr(LowerCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"boomerang") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"aboriginal") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"aboriginal") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"aboriginal") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"aboriginal") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"aboriginal") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"aborigine") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"aborigine") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"aborigine") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"aborigine") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"aborigine") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"aborigines") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"aborigines") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"aborigines") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"aborigines") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"aborigines") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"indigenous") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"indigenous") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"indigenous") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"indigenous") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"indigenous") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"didjeridu") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"didjeridu") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"didjeridu") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"didjeridu") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"didjeridu") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"didgeridoo") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"didgeridoo") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"didgeridoo") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"didgeridoo") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"didgeridoo") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement}),"boomerang") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.DesDescription}),"boomerang") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.SigStatement}),"boomerang") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.ProProductionNotes}),"boomerang") > 0

or Instr(UpperCase({ecatalog_csv.Pro2ProvenanceNotes}),"boomerang") > 0

then ({ecatalog_csv.SumRegistrationNumber})+ chr(13) + ({ecatalog_csv.DesObjectStatement})

many thanks

Karen

I am not sure what you mean by expanding an assumption - was there something that I failed to explain properly in my previous post?

This is possible, considering the fact that I am not a native English speaker, but if you point out which part exactly causes confusion, I could try to rephrase it.

Hi All,

Understandable CFL does not show in Find mode.

In find mode, you can input partial text and "*"

ie you can put ABC* in the Item code of Item master data,
When a CFL is bound to  an EditText, the field would be validated by the CFL.

Regards

Edy

When I create a multithreaded process in PB and create a NEW connection in that NVO I can see that connection and it continues to process (select 1... )     at the same time as my long running connection in my window.    The window is frozen but the multithreaded NVO keeps processing.

BUT in a CMD window I do:  netstat -an and I can see there are two active connections going to the database.  I only want ONE connection.  

We have a separate application that is looking at long running connections between machines (ie: the connections that you can see with netstat -an) and terminates them.  So even if the database has a long timeout if the connection going to the database is not doing anything (for example running a long stored procedure) than the will get terminated. 

I want to use one transaction object and start a long running stored procedure --- then in a multithreaded NVO  use that same transaction object and ever so often send a select 1...  to wake up that connection. 

You mentioned ASE 16 has a new CI Timeout feature, I am not sure how that will help with another app terminating the connect (not ASE).  Is there any white paper ...  or something I can see that explains how ASE 16 allows multithreading on their single connections?  thank you!!

Please check delta timestamp corrupted in the forum and you will get it.

It seems your delta timestamp is off. So initialize without data right now and do a repair full load.

BR,

Suyash

Hi,

Where are you experiencing this issue? Did  you check if the providers mentioned are present in the server where you are transporting?

Regards,

Loed

Hi,

Sorry I did not get your question? Can you explain it more?

Regards,

Loed

Hello Kamal,

Thank you for your prompt response.

But in material master, the price control is Standard.

Hi Reagan,

In Dialog instance work directory, I see error like:

Log: dev_jstart

F  ********************************************************************************

F  Process snapshot started with pid 26656

F  ********************************************************************************

F  [Thr 139738767996768] *** LOG => Process snapshot started (pid 26656).

F  [Thr 139738767996768] *** LOG => Process snapshot running (pid 26656).

F  [Thr 139738767996768] *** LOG => SAP Start Service (pid 26449) connected.

F  [Thr 139738767996768] *** LOG => SAP Start Service (pid 26449) disconnected.

F

F [Thr 139738767996768] Wed Mar  2 16:58:18 2016

F  [Thr 139738767996768] *** LOG => Signal 17 SIGCHLD.

F  [Thr 139738767996768] *** LOG => Process snapshot stopped (pid 26656).

F  [Thr 139738767996768] *** LOG => Instance state is "Synchronizing binaries" (STOPPING @ 0, INACTIVE).

F  [Thr 139738767996768] *** LOG => Run level 2 completed.

F  [Thr 139738767996768] *** LOG => Instance state is "Some processes failed" (STOPPED @ 0, INACTIVE).

I  [Thr 139738767996768] MPI: dynamic quotas disabled.

I  [Thr 139738767996768] MPI init: pipes=4000 buffers=1279 reserved=383 quota=10%

F

F  ********************************************************************************

F  *** ERROR => Node 'bootstrap' failed with exit code 558.

F  ***

F  *** Please see section 'Failures in the 'synchronizing binaries' phase'

F  *** in SAP Note 1316652 for additional information and trouble shooting advice.

F  ********************************************************************************

Log dev_bootstrap

F [Thr 140301051475712] Wed Mar  2 16:58:08 2016

F  [Thr 140301051475712] *** LOG => State changed from 2 (Starting framework) to 5 (Stopping).

F  [Thr 140301051475712] *** LOG    state real time: 1.011 CPU time: 0.090 sys, 2.480 usr

F  [Thr 140301051475712] *** LOG    total real time: 2.156 CPU time: 0.640 sys, 4.260 usr

F  [Thr 140301051475712]

F

F [Thr 140301024282368] Wed Mar  2 16:58:08 2016

F  [Thr 140301024282368] *** LOG => SfCJavaVm: exit hook is called. (rc = 558)

F

F Wed Mar  2 16:58:08 2016

F

F  ********************************************************************************

F  *** ERROR => Java node 'Instance_bootstrap' terminated with exit code 558.

F  ***

F  *** Please see section 'Java program exit codes'

F  *** in SAP Note 1316652 for additional information and trouble shooting advice.

F  ********************************************************************************

F

F  [Thr 140301258303328] *** LOG => exiting (exitcode 558, retcode 1).

M  [Thr 140301258303328] CCMS: CCMS Monitoring Cleanup finished successfully.

##############################################################################

My original problem is, I am upgrading SP stack in Central Instance, Why can't i leave the dialog instance shut and continue patching. Once completed, then start the dialog instance. Why does SUM process need to Stop/Start the Dialog instance.

Thanks

Vikas

https://scn.sap.com/thread/3757871

Hi Vikas,

Which version of AEX are you using? Make sure your NWDS version matches the PI/PO SP. And with the mentioned consideration use the pat 0 of NWDS for your build.

Is this the very first iFlow you are trying to create using your NWDS. If yes then check for the version and service pack. If you are having PO 7.4 SP 12 then only you can use NWDS 7.3 SP 17.

you may check for the above given thread as well.

Thanks,

Binod Kumar

Hi

After moving an ASE db to a different physical server by unmount/re-mounting SAN disks (no ASE reconfiguration), one big query is slower than before.

The ASE15.7 SP62 database was moved:

from an Oracle M4000 server (no Zone/VM, no ZFS, ASE devices in UFS filesystems mounted in directio)

to a M10-4 server (in a LDOM/VM, capped ZFS for the OS filesystem only, ASE devices in UFS filesystems mounted in directio)

=> similar: same ASE config, same SAN with SSDs, same RAM amount, same number of engines (24 in threaded-mode kernel)

=> different: faster cpu cores (3.4GHz to 2.5GHz) in different server, one layer of virtualization (hypervisor), ZFS

After the move, some SPs&queries are faster but the biggest SP doubled the time on the new server => 14 mins compared to 7 mins before.

We extracted the slowest query from the SP, updated statistics, rebuild/recreated index => still 14 mins.

sp_sysmon did not show anything interesting except the abnormaly high "fully logged DML":

Fully Logged DMLs

    by Full ULC                           22.1           2.8       19908      52.8 %

    by Single Log Record              6.8           0.9        6100      16.2 %

Then we tried to send the query result to a temporary table #test using "SELECT INTO" =>  3 mins !!!

So we thought that the query plan was wrong. We compared the query plans but did not see much difference:

similar abstract time, very closed statistics IO and time excluding the SELECT INTO part.

During my tests, I had tried to use "set statement_cache off" but it did not make any difference.

But then today I rebooted ASE, increased the procedure cache from 1800000 to 3000000 (still 14 mins)

and set "set statement_cache off" before the query => 3 mins !!!

So it is not a wrong query plan because it is fast when ignoring previous query plan.

It was confirmed by:

- stopping all db activity,

- running "dbcc purge purgesqlcache" to clean the statement cache

- checking there is no row in monCachedStatement

- running the query  => still 14 mins

- monCachedStatement shows a huge number of IOs:

SSQLID      UseCount    StatementSize MinPlanSizeKB MaxPlanSizeKB CurrentUsageCount MaxUsageCount NumRecompilesSchemaChanges NumRecompilesPlanFlushes HasAutoParams ParallelDegree QuotedIdentifier TransactionIsolationLevel TransactionMode SAAuthorization SystemCatalogUpdate MetricsCount MinPIO      MaxPIO      AvgPIO      MinLIO      MaxLIO      AvgLIO      MinCpuTime  MaxCpuTime  AvgCpuTime  MinElapsedTime MaxElapsedTime AvgElapsedTime AvgScanRows MaxScanRows AvgQualifyingReadRows MaxQualifyingReadRows AvgQualifyingWriteRows MaxQualifyingWriteRows LockWaits   LockWaitTime SortCount   SortSpilledCount TotalSortTime MaxSortTime ParallelDegreeReduced ParallelPlanRanSerial WorkerThreadDeficit DBName                         CachedDate          LastUsedDate        LastRecompiledDate  OptimizationGoal               OptimizerLevel      

----------- ----------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------------- ------------- -------------------------- ------------------------ ------------- -------------- ---------------- ------------------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- ----------- ----------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------- ----------- --------------------- --------------------- ------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------

1775483371           1          5296            94           176                 0             1                          0                        0             1              1                0                         1              32               1                   0            1        1754        1754        1754   983402953   983402953   983402953      802089      802089      802089         807229         807229         807229     3162300     3162300                 83403                 83403                      0                      0           0            0          21                7        802044      802044                     0                     0                   0 prodOdr                        Mar  2 2016  5:02PM Mar  2 2016  5:16PM                NULL allrows_oltp                   ase_current  

QUESTION: why disabling statement_cache at the session level or sending the result to #temp would be faster?

(and of course what is the link with changing the server => faster cpu and memory requires cache reconfig?)

Thanks. Vincent

Hi Saket,

Please refer to the note 2000615.

Best regards,

Shirley Wang

did you maintain the search help in the table above, Just have a look at the steps here

2273106 - The search help of the entry field is not workable in Fiori My Timesheet V2 https://scn.sap.com/thread/3148917

Hi all,

I have a time formatdate(object name; hh mm as) and I will like to add 5hrs to this time.

Does anyone have the syntax for this.

Thanks

PC

I can not check the log file of SUM as D:/ where SUM all related S/W were there, gone.

We have reached our target stack level.

I have a question, is there any way to validate the business functionality of the system.

Hello

I was seeing Activation of Shipped Goods Account in SBO 9.2. What are the advantages or use cases for Shipped Goods Account ?

Kind Regards

Héctor Santos

Hi experts,

I have a context node created with the following properties:

Cardinality: 0..n

Selection: 0..n

Intialization Lead Selection: Not checked

On the view layout, I have a table with the following properties:

rowSelectable = X

selectionChangeBehaviour = auto

selectionColumnDesign = default

selectionMode = multi

Now when I execute the application, and click on the selection column of the table, the row gets selected for a second and then gets de-selected.

If I change the context node property to

Intialization Lead Selection: X

then the first row gets selected always irrespective of the row I click on.

If I change the table property to

selectionMode = multiNoLead

then the rows get selected fine.

I have a button that opens a popup window, once the window opens the selected rows of the parent window get de-selected. I need the row selection to be available on the popup window too.

Pl guide where and what am I doing wrong.

Regards,

Reema.

Hi,

If you are working in EWM environment, we have options like 'batch specific' and ' batch neutral' at storage type level , to pick the batches.

Batch specific means, specific batch can appear in RF environment as per the ODO.

Batch neutral means, picker has the previlize to select the available batch which are available.

C K REDDY

Fede,

Thank you for the response. What upgrade?

Just download and test a copy of SAP ASE 16.0 !!! and try it out.

Regards,

Jean-Pierre

Hi ,

Can we have multiple lines of text in the label field for example 'without scripting'

Company Code

Company

Code