Hi,
I guess you are talking about planned order then try tcode IP19 , IP24..
Hi,
I guess you are talking about planned order then try tcode IP19 , IP24..
You asked the same question in 2011: Shipment Cost Document Cancel
Hi Nitin,
Try debugging to see if the data is coming as 1/1/10000 from backend I guess it got increased by one day from 31/12/9999.
Please check whether the timezone is similar for user profile, frontend system and backend system.
Regards,
Sarbjeet Singh
Hello Lorena,
I think there is a structural problem from the beginning. Let me ask you some questions:
- do you have work centers and routings?
- If you have work centers, have you defined activity types, interoperation times, capacities?
These are some of the basic structures for a production order. If you have these settings, you have to add standard values like setup time, labor time, machine time etc. in the routing. In this case the start and finish time will be different according to the time defined and individual changes will separately be saved.
To answer to your 3rd question, from the production order you can define a finished date with a scheduling type "Backwards", the system will provide a start date. Or you define a start date with a scheduling type "Forwards", the system will provide a finish date.
You can also simulate from with in the routing: Extra / scheduling / schedule.
Hope this helps
Best regards
Hallo Maxim,
thanks for your answer, but I have already checked the structure (It should be correct). Perhaps there are Customizing settings to maintain?
For the other tables I use the standard import Structure to fill Data. The table for partner is initial. I could not fill this table with data in the Import structure. I only maintain iv_bu_partner (that's the account) and iv_contact (contact person).
In the attachment there is a screenshot.
Thank you and kind regards
Anna
i am sure that you have missed something in chart mapping please check that also i don't know how you are deselecting the values, at-least one value will be selected once you selected the scorecard.
Dear all,
both in SAP Business ByDesign and SAP Cloud for Customer, extension fields to Standard BOs are not filled in the backend.
Sometimes, they are randomly filled, e.g. when displayed, the fields contain information. If I execute the query via the repository explorer the fields are empty. I usually fill the fields via webservices or ABSL code. This is not only the case for our customer company tenants but for every tenant/system in the world.
Best regards,
Rufat
Hi All,
In ECC - one version available Ex -0010 for material X plant Y
In APO - Two PDS available Ex - With same combination, PDS name also same , only validity period are different.
I could not understand the reason behind this, Please guide me
Rgds
SDB
Just to add a correction to Amit's reply the schedules don't disappear after the user is removed. The schedule owner gets changed from the "deleted" user to administrator. The schedule remains active but it fails every time it runs on the next run time with the error : Object failed to run due to insufficient security privileges.
Regards,
Kashif
Could you please provide screenshot of info object where I can check.
Hi,
I have a scenario where the MRP generated PR release date got shifted to the day MRP data like GR processing time was updated in MM02.
Initially PR was requested on 12/24/2015 with release date the same when stock went below Reorder point.
Later on 2/16/15 there was a GR processing time update done to the material plant in MM02.
There after MRP was run for the plant and the PR release date got changed to 2/16/15.
Does anyone know why the Release date gets changed for already existing MRP generated PR when GR processing time is updated instead of keeping release date same and changing delivery date so it could meet w.r.t the date when stock went below reorder point ?
Thanks in advance.
only by doing some coding in the BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST
Pessoal,
Para registro a SAP liberou uma solução para isso, vejam as notas :
2265956 - DN CAT 06: NF Writer changes for Importation Scenarios
2265957 - DN CAT 06: NF Writer changes for Importation Scenarios - UDO Report
Sds,
Jose Gama
Pessoal,
Para registro a SAP liberou uma solução para isso, vejam as notas :
2265956 - DN CAT 06: NF Writer changes for Importation Scenarios
2265957 - DN CAT 06: NF Writer changes for Importation Scenarios - UDO Report
Sds,
Jose Gama
Hi Bjorn,
That's a good suggestion, however we can get lot error messages, incompletion logs etc.
and then once you have a incompletion log - I even tried to hit the button save in the incompletion popup and catch that in another script and replaced it with a new custom button, but system keeps just hanging in that popup.
So now my last hope is the put and get functions, but as I replied above to Sushant that I am getting into some issues while trying to use those functions.
Thanks for your help.
Ah, I never found Andy's blog before when I was researching this. If I had, I might not have bothered writing my own, though mine does focus on 7.0x instead of 7.3+. The differences are relatively minor (generation of the keytab file, use of Visual Admin instead of NWA, and can't use AES encryption, only RC4).
If your asset has already been depreciating, the depreciation start date should be the actual date i.e.17/7/97
Dear All,
Scenario: Through Interface we push mass serial numbers from non SAP to SAP with pairing data
Condition: No same serial number push from non SAP to SAP System
Suppose X is material having 1234 serial numbers with ABCD pairing data
Issue: For X material 1234 Serial numbers are manually created by IQ04 ( not through interface) so this created serial number is without ABCD Pairing data
During confirmation there is one check which checks pairing data available or not, so during 131 movement we come to know there is no pairing for 1234 serial number
So we make deletion flag for 1234 SR No. of X material for push the same material X & same SR. No. 1234 with ABCD Pairing data from non SAP to SAP
But According to condition No same serial number push from non SAP to SAP System
So First through IQ02, for Sr.No: 1234 remove deletion flag & make it AVLB
Now Change Sr.No. 1234 to 9999 & now above condition is excluded & able to push same SR.NO 1234 for material X with ABCD Pairing data
Here we are getting correct serial number 1234 in AVLB Status with pairing data ABCD ( Interface Data just Pushed )
Again make deletion flag for SR No: 9999
But For material X having other serial numbers 1231, 1232 etc... showing last serial number as 9999 in IQ02 so how to delete this last serial number from system
If not change/delete there is any effect for in between serial numbers or for any reporting?? because same serial is updated in MASE table
As 9999 is last serial number showing in system is there any effect on other in between serial numbers which is pushed in SAP through non SAP system
Please help
Thanks & Regards,
Madhukar Poul
Thanks for quick response.
Please suggest me for below questions.
1) Are hybris commerce and hybris marketing different products ?
What is hybris marketplace then ?
2) Correct me if i am wrong. my assumption is that sap acquired hybris commerce a java based product and renamed it customer engagement intelligence and is rebuilding it via hana views and UI5 also providing it to deploy on cloud.
3) Are you suggesting hybris marketing as it is the new product being built on hana and customers are loving it.
4) When you say trend is more towards ui driven customizing , is it UI5 skill customization or Functional level configurations in GUI ?
5) As per your suggestions "having strong functional knowledge of each feature and how it can configured will be a big plus too."
Which functional module do i need to gain knowledge of as pre requisite to learn hybris products?
Appreciate your Suggestions