Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8851 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: multiple line items in smartform using template

0
0

Go with Table, its ultimate solution, remove Template. I agree with Above chintu sharma reply.


Re: Issue with UoM (Message no. ME057)

0
0

pLEASE check the T006A table with the vendor language / plant language for the UOM maintained in the PO .iF NOT MAINTAINEDE please maintain the same in the system with the language by logging in with the same language in CUNI .

Re: Service organisation creation problem

0
0

Hi, Suman,

 

Yes, validity dates are correct. I will write to support about it.

 

Than you again.

 

Best regards,

Nadezhda Rukavishnikova

Re: MM02  BDC Problem while selecting views of different material?

0
0

Dear Sir,

 

Thanks again for your prompt responses.

 

Thats Ok with me .

 

I am asking that for e.g

plant is in 3rd row of excel sheet .

then how that FM will identify the value of plant .

It is coming in stock value then .

 

 

can you elaborate on this???

 

Thanks

Karan

Re: Same vendor in Multiple Payment proposal as per Business Place

0
0

Hello Dwarik,

 

I had the same requirements for one former customer. the F110 controls purpose is to not permit the double payment of a bill. The control in F110 is at vendor level.

SAP doesn't provide solution in standard to fix this issue. We had to change F110 control the system funtionnality directly in F110 program.

 

Here below the standard SAP control for F110:

When a vendor is in one payment proposal, the line items proposed for payment are recorded in REGUP table with the vendor name, indication that the line items are only in proposal and the temporary document number.

 

SAP Control

When you are trying to include this vendor in a another payment, the system control in REGUP table if this vendor has not already in another proposal. If yes, this vendor can't be include in new proposal.

 

As you see, the control is at vendor Level. The solution for your problem will be to put the control at Vendor Line items level which is also possible throught the REGUP table.

 

 

Customised Solution

With the help of a developper, you have to do 2 things:

- Bypass the control on REGUP at vendor level

- Active a control by BTE 1820 to block for payment vendors document line items already included in another payment proposal

 

Avantages: You can include vendor in multiple payment proposals and you can still control that the vendor document line items are not in 2 payment proposals

 

Please revert if this solution helps you to fix the issue.

 

Regards,

Guédé KOUBI

Re: ERROR => Request URI too long and ERROR => illegal request in DEV_ICM

0
0

Hi,

 

We are getting this error in PI production system .

 

The suggested URL for EP system.

 

regards,

Mahesh

Re: Error: Not linked to an active project cycle

Re: Functional Area Derivation rule not working

0
0

Hi Elnady,

 

Share screen shot of substitution defined?

 

Regards,

Mukthar


Re: Change the Data Fondation with the same Business Layer

0
0

Dear Joao

 

 

 

 

   The update on Data foundation has to be seen in business layer

 

 

So, please check if you saved the data foundation associated to the business
layer , then make refresh structure in Business layer: check that you can the
update in business layer then publish the it to repository

This way have to not impact reports based on the universe

 

 

Best Regards

Ines

MSS Requsition Creation Error MSS~REC~REQ

0
0

Hi Experts  Nicole GeischnekRoman Weise

 

While creating requisition from MSS Role we have been encountering error..

 

 

 

mss~rec~req.jpg

 

 

 

500 Internal Server Error is returned for HTTP request [http://rplhrqas.reliancepower.com:50300/webdynpro/resources/sap.com/pb/PageBuilder]:

  component [dispatcher],

  web module [webdynpro/resources/sap.com/mss~rec~req],

  application [sap.com/mss~rec~req],

  DC name [sap.com/mss~rec~req],

  CSN component[EP-PCT-MGR-HR],

  problem categorization [],

  internal categorization [749540707]

Re: Error in MO - Performance based stretegy Plan

0
0

Hi Bhatt,

 

Assign the respective operations to packages in Task list.

 

Again, once you create first Meas doc with reading as 1 HR, system will start scheduling & generate Planned dates. but as soon you enter next reading as 30000 HR, system will generate the calls for the due packages.

 

Why you want to put 30000 HR reading?

 

Thanks.

 

Amol

Re: Cancellation of Part-1 Posting after QA/QC rejection

0
0

thanks all. resolved.

Re: transport request delete

0
0

Hi Praveen,

 

Tcode STMS_IMPORT --> GOTO --> TP SYSTEM LOG

 

 

Regards,

Prithviraj.

Re: Assigning Cost Center to GL Acct. in MIRO

0
0

Hi,

 

System ask for which G/L is it round of G/l in MIRO?

 

If yes then make OKB9 setting for that cost element

In OKB9 maintain only cost center for that cost element do not make any other assignment(for profit center,valuation area etc)

 

cost center.jpg

Regards

Prasad

Re: How to check procedure for variant configuration

0
0

Hi Flavio,

 

Thanks for your quick response.

 

I am new in variant configuration .Can you please let me know how to find the dependency for particular procedure.

How would i know which component i can change in table as there are so many component with name 'others'.

 

My issue is when i press F4 in classification for component characteristics in MM02 it shows so many options but when i click to change it it shows me that error which i have mentioned in my post. so how to change that value from "11" to "9" for component characteristics. Is this from table or i need to look into procedure.

please help me more on this issue.

 

Thanks a ton,

Mahaveer


Prompt should updated with current date in WebI

0
0

http://scn.sap.com/thread/1928697

 

Hello,

 

I have a webi report developed on top of BEx query.

I have a date prompt where it should update with the current date when I run the report, as I am using WebI 4.1.

I found a similar thread (above link) but it was with BO 3.0 and was on top of universe.

 

Hence, please suggest do we have any workaround/solution to this.

 

Thanks,

Vishal.

Re: DBMS ?

0
0

No. You cannot go for a CPU based model... As I said in the previous answer it wasn't clear to me

if those are 100 different installations or a server installation serving 100+ clients. In your case it's 100 different installations so you have to by separate clients.

 

Andreas.

Re: Unable to enter Parameter ID for Data Element

0
0

Hi Danny,

 

try switching off the modification assistance EDIT->Modification Assistance.

 

 

Regards,

Menka

Re: Issue while creating service PO with more than ten line items

Re: Counter / Count Key in IW28 / IW38

0
0

I'm sure, there are no fields like Count or Country key in these reports.  Hope you are not mistaking the Country key to Count Key. Also you compare the PRD client also, what is the situation there?

Viewing all 8851 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images