Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8851 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Automatic Assignment of roles to users of portal


Re: Change in comp. overview & op. overview of prod. order

$
0
0

Okay fine Abhishek ,

 

Correctly speaking  quantities of components  of Production Order should not be changed , after all it is picked from the Master Data i.e BOM details ( I think for that reason only BAPI is only allowing to change HEADER details only ). So  you make the necessary changes in BOMs.

Re: Change in comp. overview & op. overview of prod. order

$
0
0

In my company any such alteration with Quantities in CO11N is restricted at user ID level .

Re: Down Payment Request needs reversing

$
0
0

Hi

 

What is error?

 

Regards

Nakul

Re: Solman 7.0 sp 17 Guid me

$
0
0

Dear Roman

I ask that i update solman or Install new 7.1 sp8

which is good for me because when i install new 7.1 then i configure also it is easy to configure 7.1 sp8

please guide me on this topic

 

Nainesh

9376998808

Unbable to search on SCN

$
0
0

Hi there,

 

Can you please urgently assist. Since about one week, I am unable to use the search functionality on SCN.

 

I tries Mozilla , IE and Chrome but nothing worked so far. For IE I also reset the settings w/o success.

 

After executing the search it seems that I am not redirected to the results page but instead the page only shows the header of the SCN website, no matter what search term I enter. (screenshot attached)

 

Please help.

 

Thanks

 

Ibrahim

Re: Items not reflecting as overdue-FBL5N (AB document type)

$
0
0

Dear Parth,

 

Thank you for providing the oss note its useful  but in my case the the scenario is different.

 

Below process flow...

Payment term 60 days

 

1-Billing document from SD route created.(dated 28.05.2013 which already due)

2-Check payment  received from customers through T code F-02( we are not using  the t code F-28)(dated 01.08.2013)

3-Clearing both the document t-code F-32 dated 01.08.2013 (Using standard option change of difference with putting Posting key 07 and customer code and with difference amount.we are not using the option partial payment and residual payment.

4- this difference amount showing as open item doc type AB in FBL5N  with not due which should have shown overdue.

 

The same process uses in before 4.7 and shown as overdue and after up gradation we facing this as not due.

Please find the screen shot for your reference....

 

 

 

Regards

Pulak

Re: Highlight row in viewer

$
0
0

Hi Anne,

 

 

You can go the section Expert --> select the section in which you want condition shuld be der --> Select color tab --> add you condtion in formula.

 

 

 

 

Thanks & Regards,

Darshita


Re: Duplicate invoices verification not working in FI

$
0
0

Hello Nakul,

 

Thanks for your reply. Yes, I came across this recommendation before and I will try. However, when solving a problem I want also to educate myself a bit. Now, the question is:

 

1. Is the problem (i.e. failed invoice duplicity check) really caused just by missing message? Is it proven that adding the message will bring back the required functionality?

2. This is the standard SAP functionality. What is the cause that the message is not in the system? When searching for the solution I found several records of the same case.

 

Anyway, I will try and report back.

 

regards,

Jan

Problem with new Stat sub transaction

$
0
0

Hi Team,

 

i have created a new Stat miscellaneous debit sub-transaction and completed all settings including FQZB. and i have posted the manual transaction through FPE1.

 

actually as per our process if there is any stat open item it will adjusted in current bill by doing account clearing automatically and it will show in Bill form.

 

but for this new stat sub transaction is not showing in bill and not happening account clearing also. please advise how to find out the problem.

 

note: i have checked with existing main/sub and posted the manual posting and generate the bill. for those transactions are performing well.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Regards,

Srinivas

Re: EWA Report Security Issues Highlighted

$
0
0

Hi Rishi,

 

As I have changed the password of sap* in 066 client.But I am not able to login to the 001 client with sap* user,as I can login to 001 client with ddic user with other password not the standard one.

I want to know should I change the password of sap* with ddic user in 001 client?

Can you please suggest please?

 

Many Thanks

Ajitabh

Re: Problem with sap.m.List binding

$
0
0

OK, so let's go back a step. Let's take a public OData source that we can both consume, and see where we get to.

 

http://services.odata.org/Northwind/Northwind.svc/

 

Let's take the Products entityset and consume that. Can you take your code and point the model at the Northwind service and pull the Product entities into your list? I have just changed the code that I supplied (above) to point to this service, changed the property name bindings {ProductName} and {ProductID} and it works fine.

 

Let us know how you get on. Perhaps from the results we can identify whether the problem lies in the data or the code.

 

dj

Re: What is meaning $[$] use in query.

$
0
0

Hi,

 

There are two ways to write FMS query

 

1. $[Table name. FieldName]

 

2. $[$Field index. FieldColumn.Number/Currency/Date/0]

 

$[$4.0.0] stands for,

 

$- System variable

 

4--->Field index

 

0----Field column

 

0---If the field contains single value (Quantity, BP code)

 

Other two formats are not correct.

 

How to get? Please refer belwo screen shot from sales order

 

12.PNG

Field index is 4

 

If the required field is title field the field column value is 0

 

0- Single value of BP code

 

You can write FMS like $[ORDR.Cardcode]

 

Hope helpful.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Nagarajan

Re: Calulate Tax Box in MIRO

$
0
0

Hi Benjamin

 

You don't need to check calculate tax, go to tax tab and give manual tax and click on net proposal system will allow you to process and tax value will not be zero.

 

Also if your calculate check box is default check, then check whether any screen variant you are using or check the parameter id in user profile it should be X for parameter id of calculate check .

 

Hope it will resolve your issue.

 

Regards

 

Pankaj pandey

Re: Netweaver main topics

$
0
0

Hello Ram,

 

Have a look on the blog by  Juan Reyes where you can find nice suggestion on BASIS front:

 

https://scn.sap.com/community/netweaver-administrator/blog/2010/05/11/back-to-basis

 

Check below link for routine tasks, though it requires adding few more i.e : SM66/SM50, AL08/SM04,ST03/ST03n,ST06n,ST04/DB02, SM12 (explore on your own about all these transaction code,this will help you to know more about these) :

 

http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=311330914&bc=true 

 

 

and yes of course you need to go though TADM books (TADM10,TADM12 and TADM5X depending on DB you are interested).

 

All the best,

SUJIT

 

Update: https://scn.sap.com/community/netweaver-administrator/blog/2013/08/05/daily-workout-of-an-basis-admin-to-ensure-system-availability-integrity

 

Blog by Nilutpal Sharmah  a good read.

 

Message was edited by: SUJIT SHARMA


Re: House Bank selection in APP

$
0
0

hi Ravi,

I am afraid SAP does not give you dynamic selection option to chose House bank for payment during APP.

You have to set exact rules based on ranking order, currency, amounts or you can create different payment methods exclusively for different banks.

 

Thanks

Vasu

Re: Data from Bex query vanishes when free char(40) is drilldown.

$
0
0

Hi prashant,

 

Actually at BW side Short/medium/long descriptions can have length of 20/40/60 accordingly.

But at source or info object level text descriptions may not be maintained(stored) as exactly 20/40/60 length respectively.

 

So take respective text object value, check at info object level how it stored for short description, as my guess it will be below 20 chars. if you need 20 length of description then you need to change at source side or Bw side.

 

Thanks

Re: *FOR and TMVL at Script Logic

$
0
0

Hi Ana,

 

Save the script with warning, the value of the variable (%MONTHS_ALL%) will be determined after execution of the script, hence the warning.

 

Another point, in you REC statement, "*EXPRESSION=%VALUE% " is not required, just omit it. For e.g.,

*REC(ACCOUNT="PGTOIMP_221001", TIME=TMVL(1,%TIM%))

 

would be enough.

 

Regards,

Kalyan.

Re: Table is not visible in webi

$
0
0

Hii Sampath ,

 

kindly check the objects used in these two blocks and also confirm that there are no Filters

which displays blank data in this blocks .

 

Regards

Jeetan

Deriving Fund center/Commit.Item at maintenance order-item level

$
0
0

Hi ,

We are using PM order with operation account assignment. This enables settlement of cost at operation level. At operation level SAP has provided equipment. The cost at item level gets settled to cost center maintained in the equipment maintained at operation level.

 

Now we need to activate funds management. Standard FM will use FMDT_READ_ORDER_PM_FROM_FMZUOB. The input parameter for this function module is order number. However we need a function module where I can input order number and operation number so that FC & Comm.Item is determined automatically .

 

I believe  this feature is available in ECC6.0 SP6. We are in SP4 and can't upgrade to SP6 immediately.

 

We are planning to use PM order exits to read each operation and manually write program to derive FC & Comm.Item . Deriving fund center is not a big task but since a order operation can contain many cost elements (material or service) , we are finding it difficult to write logic for derving committment item.

 

We also need to write code to enter comm.amount in FMZUOB table which is also tough.

 

Hence I seek some expert guidance to know how this can be achieved ?

 

Thanks in advance

NP

Viewing all 8851 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images