Sanil,
Thanks for your feedback.
What I want is that intercompany info on COPA to send its information as I/F.
So, since sales info and COGS info will be on one COPA document,
trading partner information will be derived from customer master anyway.
So, substitution to FI line item of COGS might be not required for this purpose.
Yoshi
The option I usually use in PR approval workflows is a decision task:
If the user approves - I use the release method (background)
If the user rejects - I send a task to the initiator/buyer (usually a responsibility rule based on the purchase group) this has no effect on the status of the PR. no need to change it since it's not released.
if you don't want to use a rule you can add a task of selection of the recipient at the rejection branch.
if you are using the direct release by the user in ME54N then the task will be completed by an event (release or reject). To the best of by understanding in this case the dialog process chain option will not work and you will need to find the recipient in another way (initiator/rule/partner function in the PR etc.)
Hi John
Have you entered a value in the DocTotal column?
Kind regards
Peter Juby
Olá Justino,
O tratamento deve sim ser realizado no método FILL_ITEM e este valor é movido para o XML normalmente após a aplicação da nota 1933985
Você esta enfrentado este problema pois esta com a versão antiga desta nota, acredito que se você implementar esta nova versão (5) o seu problema será resolvido.
Veja no print abaixo que existe o tratamento no include nesta nova versão da nota.
Att,
Johnatan
Hi Anupama,
To go for SF certification you have to enroll in Introduction to Mastery training in successfactors LMS portal. The learning involves cost and can be paid by your organization. Try to get access to SF LMS first and complete the pre-requisite trainings.
Regards,
Abhineet Mittra
Hello Adam,
Did you check CS_BOM_EXPL_MAT_V2 and CSAP_MAT_BOM_READ either of one should have sorting logic.
Br
KK
Hi Virendra,
I replicated the scenario in the following steps,
1) Created a PR from project for 4 quantity
2) Created a PO wrt this PR for 4 quantity
3) Did the GR for 3 quantity
4) Then changed the quantity in CJ20N for the material to 3 and saved the project.
5) Checked the PR in ME53N and PR quantity changed to 3.
6) In ME22N changed the PO quantity from 4 to 3
7) Checked CJI5 and i cant see any remaining commitment.
It worked ok for me. Hope this is what you did.
Regards,
Gokul
Hi All,
I have a requirement like....
_______________________________________________________________________________
Header : Previous Month Ending Bal : 9975
Details :
Day DailyAmount NetCredit/Debit EndingBalance myfield ABCD
1 100 25 10,000 9975 ?
2 100 -50 9,950 10,000 ?
3 100 -45 9,905 9,950 ?
4 100 75 9,980 9,905 ?
5 100 -100 9,880 9,980 ?
...........
________________________________________________________________________________
For Ending Balance, i am using the shared variable from Avelino Fidels's response to Bala on http://scn.sap.com/thread/1871405
But i need to calculate some other values using that "my field" values of which i couldnt able to store anywhere.
In a single sentence my question is to calculate Day 2 ABCD value i need that Day1 Ending Balance value.
Please suggest me some ideas or give me answers whatever you know in this regard.
Thanks in advance.
--Ven G.
Check out the function module : CO_FS_SORT_COMPONENT_LIKE_BOM, from the note 142902.
Sorry the alignment of the layout went wrong...Hopefully it can be understood.
Hi,
In the incoming days we will face the upgarde of our current SAP BI Platform (4.0 SP8) to next minor release (4.1). One of most challenging points is to ensure the proper behaviour of existing SDK customizations based on Report Engine API available at 4.0. I know that SAP is promoting use of Restful Web Services as a way to implement functionality previously delivered by JAVA API but my question is. Will current Report Engine API based developments work under in 4.1 release? In other words, has SAP planned an smooth transition from Report Engine API to restful Web Services scenario (compatibility scenario 
) or code will have to be completely rewriten 
?
Thanks,
Excellent, thanks.
That's done now.
Ok, so now I have a string that has my data in it something like this:
Car1|Garage1|test1=2.00& test2=0.01@
I added the & and the @ sign to seperate the values. So I have all the data, now I want to put it in the cross tab. So getting back to the original example with the latest requirement change:
garage1 garage2(etc...) car1 test1 2 23
test2 .01
I just added another row item (test) in the cross tab and the row shows up just fine, how do I seperate the data between the 2 test?
Thanks a million.
I tried that. System gives me an error that NUMBER is not a valid type.
As per the SAP documentation, here are the valid types that we can use.
INTEGER, BIT, TINYINT, SMALLINT, BIGINT, FLOAT, REAL, DOUBLE, NUMERIC, DECIMAL, CHAR, VARCHAR, STRING, LONGVARCHAR, DATE, TIME, TIMESTAMP, BINARY, VARBINARY, LONGVARBINARY, BLOB (input and output),CLOB (input and output), CURSOR (output; only in conjunction with the Oracle JDBC driver).
So, can you suggest if there are any other options to help troubleshoot?
Actually, quite a few customers run with that many engines/memory. In fact, it is difficult these days to even buy a server with less than 128GB of memory and 16 cores/32 threads. Pretty much the only time we see less is when the install is in a VM. Interestingly, we had comments from the first version suggesting the numbers were not realistic given the typical size of systems being deployed were much larger.... In addition, in my experience with customers on SAP systems, they were not aware of how much memory was necessary to really support medium to large systems based on the configurations they were attempting.
I am sorry that you feel some of the examples are contradictory. You are correct in pointing out that the text refers to 16 engines and the example configures 32.... So yes, for that specific example, it should have been 16.
Secondly, not having seen ADM540, but I think there is a bit of a problem if they suggest that. I my opinion (and I have spent a lifetime tuning ASE), the idle timeout for ERP and BW should likely both be 1000+ and 2000 is not unreasonable. The comment in ADM540 is likely due to if ASE and a NW CI are sharing the same cores - e.g. you have a 4 core box and ASE is running on 2 cores (we will ignore threads for this discussion) and you have 30 NW worker processes - which obviously will need to bump ASE off the cpu in order to run. This may be fine in a test/dev or even a solution manager system, but bumping ASE off the core is NOT a good thing for a production system. In fact, I would encourage using numactl or similar to fence off the the cores used for ASE from NW worker processes if at all possible. We have seen cases of overloaded NW installations with multiple CI instances with hundreds of worker processes each starving cpu away from ASE......sooo....I would tend to actually be a bit more than firm on suggesting that 100 is a very bad starting point. Given the number of client side joins that SAP uses to avoid [DBMS proprietary] temp tables, it is critical that ASE's (or any DBMS) response time be minimized as much as possible.....having ASE yield the core practically as soon as it gets done processing one task (and puts it to sleep pending an IO) just really causes things to run slow. Think of a typical query that returns 10 rows - say wide enough that each row fills 1 packet. If the packet transmit time (and client ACK) takes more than 100 microseconds on CPU (almost a given for network interactions...as clock ticks are in nanoseconds and networking is minimally milliseconds - 1000 microseconds), ASE would yield the CPU every time it sent a packet. When the client wanted the next packet, the OS would have to wake up the ASE process (an interrupted sleep) which is a nasty heavy weight operation. Hence it is best for ASE to hang out on the CPU until reasonably sure that nothing more is going to happen very soon....and on current cpus...and having it run for 1-2ms (1000-2000 microseconds) shouldn't be a hardship. If you created a separate thread pool for batch worker processes, then I could see maybe using a lower idle timeout such as 200 or 250......100 is just plain too low in my mind...it is like saying ASE is expecting an odd query every few seconds vs. a steady workload. Basically at that level, there had better be a task in the ASE job queue or one on the way on the network already, or that engine is going to sleep.
While I state that with regards to ADM540 itself, I have not seen the class (perhaps)...one customer did show me the notebook of a class (ASE Sys Admin) they went to and it was really targeted at non-SAP installations more than SAP installations - from a reality/experience aspect. Part of the issue with the class the customer showed me was it borrowed liberally from the old SY classes as a starting point, but at the point the class was developed there was not a lot of experience with running SAP installations on ASE to really point out the fine tweaking areas such as idle timeout.
However, the document was really aimed primarily at Business Suite vs. BW systems or a Solution Manager install (which are much smaller) - there are a lot of other considerations for BW the guide doesn't get into - although some of the sizing is a better start than the defaults provided by SAPINST
The former runtime guide essentially was just merged in to the Post-Migration Steps section.
May do a quick refresh in the near-future (due to some recent experiences), so if you have other specific examples of the text and SQL not aligning - please let me know.
Bien, muchas gracias Javier Faces
si, eso de que muestre solamente los nuevo y no los que se encuentran en otro mensaje me agrada
gracias por tu atención y apoyo
salu2
Hi Rahul,
What is version of B1 and B1 App in your i-Phone?
Thanks,
Gordon
I've 3 years of experience in SAP SD. Recently, I had an sap sd interview where guy on the other side asked me. "Have you even had a business requirement or GAP that you were not able fulfill?" (Even enhancement cannot fill the gap).
Have anyone experienced these sort of business requirement? Please share. Thanks in advance.
Hi Ryan
Thanks a lot for your response
I am attaching screenshot of message mapping which has the screenshot of message mapping I am working on as per your recommendation
There is a slight change in requirement to get the material identification value also from the response structure of webservice. So I have to collect those values also in hashmap along with tuple values
And then I am not sure if the getparameter("matmap") will fetch tuple and material internal id in the way you mentioned? how does it fetch the correct tuple and material internal ID values as per the right context of materail ID? I am not getting it properly
thx
mike
Hi,
This is one of the B1 limitation for UNION combined query. There is no solution so far.
Thanks,
Gordon
Boa Tarde Lucas
Tivemos um mesmo problema em um cliente que estava em um SP13 e foi direto para o SP16, então foi necessário executar o item 3 da nota abaixo:
SAP Note: 1856170
"3. The following XI Content changes apply if you are using the Skipping
Request:
The Skipping Request requires an additional mapping due to changes
in the proxy communication with Support Package 14. Therefore, the
Interface Determination from the WebAS ABAP to the ccBPM of the
Configuration Scenario for the SKIPR_WebAS_Outbound_SkippingRequest
has to be amended. Please add the Interface Mapping / Operation
Mapping SKIPR_nfeInutilizacaoNF2_TO_nfeInutilizacaoNF2 to the
Interface Determination (using F4 help). Another option would be to
re-generate the configuration using the Model Configurator."
Att,
Marlio Dias jr
